asset: lose value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loan
Weight: 0.68
, option
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.64
, talent
Weight: 0.64
, good will
Weight: 0.57
, domain
Weight: 0.55
, farmland
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
lose value 1.00
be to value 0.89
want value 0.88
is value 0.88
be to value important 0.87
have time value 0.86
be hard to value 0.86
want value for money 0.84
depreciate in value 0.83
be perceived value 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(customer, be perceived value)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, lose value)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(option, lose value)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, lose value)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(loan, be to value important)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, lose value)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(loan, be to value)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, lose value)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(option, have time value)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, lose value)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(option, lose value)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(loan, be to value)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(option, have time value)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(loan, be to value important)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(customer, be perceived value)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(option, lose value)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(customer, be perceived value)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(option, have time value)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, be to value)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be to value important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(option, lose value)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(asset, lose value)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(customer, be perceived value)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(asset, lose value)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(loan, be to value important)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(asset, lose value)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(loan, be to value)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(asset, lose value)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(option, have time value)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(asset, lose value)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(asset, lose value)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(asset, depreciate in value)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(asset, be hard to value)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(asset, depreciate in value)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(asset, be hard to value)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(asset, depreciate in value)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(asset, lose value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, lose value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, be to value)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loan, be to value important)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(option, have time value)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(option, lose value)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(customer, be perceived value)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(option, lose value)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, be to value)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loan, be to value important)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(option, have time value)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, lose value)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(customer, be perceived value)