astronomy: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	field Weight: 0.63 , art Weight: 0.62 , study Weight: 0.62 , science Weight: 0.61 , subject Weight: 0.60
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.36 , meteorology Weight: 0.35 , mathematics Weight: 0.35 , physics Weight: 0.35 , quantum physics Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(astronomy, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(astronomy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(field, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(astronomy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(field, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(astronomy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(astronomy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(computer science, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(astronomy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(astronomy, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(astronomy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(computer science, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(computer science, has quality good)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(astronomy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(meteorology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(meteorology, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(astronomy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(astronomy, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(astronomy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(astronomy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(astronomy, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(astronomy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(astronomy, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(astronomy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(field, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(astronomy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(computer science, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(astronomy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(meteorology, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(astronomy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(field, has quality good)