astronomy: relates to meteorology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.63
, art
Weight: 0.62
, study
Weight: 0.62
, science
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.35
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
relates to meteorology 1.00
relate to science 0.78
was different from astronomy 0.77
relate to biology 0.76
is science 0.75
be related to physics 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(physics, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be related to physics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(physics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(physics, is science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be related to physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be related to physics)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(astronomy, relates to meteorology)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(astronomy, relate to biology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relate to biology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(astronomy, relate to biology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(astronomy, relate to biology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(astronomy, is science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was different from astronomy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relate to science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be related to physics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(astronomy, is science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(astronomy, relate to science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(astronomy, relate to science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(astronomy, relate to science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(astronomy, was different from astronomy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(astronomy, be related to physics)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(astronomy, was different from astronomy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(astronomy, was different from astronomy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be related to physics)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(astronomy, be related to physics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(astronomy, relates to meteorology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(mathematics, be related to physics)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(physics, is science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relates to meteorology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)