atomic clock: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents clock
Weight: 0.81
, device
Weight: 0.67
, time
Weight: 0.62
, technology
Weight: 0.60
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings alarm clock
Weight: 0.38
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.35
, nuclear fission
Weight: 0.34
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
has quality bad 0.87
has quality good 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(technology, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(technology, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(alarm clock, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(technology, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(nuclear fission, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(nuclear fission, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(smoke detector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(alarm clock, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(alarm clock, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(atomic clock, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(atomic clock, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(atomic clock, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(atomic clock, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(atomic clock, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(atomic clock, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(atomic clock, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(smoke detector, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(alarm clock, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(nuclear fission, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(atomic clock, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)