attention: be to detail important in administrative job roles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.64
, experience
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, gift
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mind
Weight: 0.32
, support
Weight: 0.31
, care
Weight: 0.31
, concern
Weight: 0.31
, excitement
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to detail important in administrative job roles 1.00
be to detail important in job roles 0.95
be to detail important in business 0.83
be in job 0.81
be to detail important in police work 0.81
be to detail important in accounting 0.81
be in job required 0.81
be important to detail 0.81
be to detail important 0.81
be needed in job 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(experience, be needed in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(experience, be in job required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(experience, be in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(experience, be in job)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(experience, be in job required)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(experience, be needed in job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(experience, be in job)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(experience, be in job required)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(experience, be needed in job)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(experience, be needed in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(experience, be in job required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(experience, be in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(attention, be to detail important in job roles)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(attention, be to detail important in job roles)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(attention, be to detail important in job roles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(attention, be important to detail)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(attention, be to detail important)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(experience, be in job)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(experience, be in job required)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(experience, be needed in job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(experience, be in job)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(experience, be in job required)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(experience, be needed in job)