attention: be to detail important in job roles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.64
, experience
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, gift
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mind
Weight: 0.32
, support
Weight: 0.31
, care
Weight: 0.31
, concern
Weight: 0.31
, excitement
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to detail important in job roles 1.00
be to detail important in administrative job roles 0.95
be to detail important in business 0.85
be important to detail 0.84
be to detail important 0.84
be in role important 0.84
be in role 0.84
be to detail good 0.84
has quality role 0.83
is bot-lane role 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(experience, be in role important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(attention, be to detail important in job roles)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(attention, be to detail important in job roles)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(experience, be in role)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(experience, be in role important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(experience, be in role important)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(experience, be in role)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(experience, be in role important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(attention, be to detail important in job roles)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(experience, be in role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(attention, be to detail important in job roles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(attention, be to detail important in job roles)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(attention, be important to detail)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(attention, be to detail important)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(attention, be important to detail)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(attention, be to detail important)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(attention, be to detail good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(attention, be to detail important in business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in administrative job roles)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(attention, be to detail good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(attention, be to detail important in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(attention, be important to detail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(attention, be to detail important in business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(attention, be to detail important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(attention, be to detail good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important to detail)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in job roles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(attention, be to detail important in job roles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(experience, be in role)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(experience, be in role important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(experience, be in role)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(attention, be to detail important in job roles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(experience, be in role important)