australia day: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents day
Weight: 0.70
, holiday
Weight: 0.52
, opportunity
Weight: 0.51
, excuse
Weight: 0.50
, time
Weight: 0.50
Siblings columbus day
Weight: 0.37
, july
Weight: 0.35
, earth day
Weight: 0.35
, independence day
Weight: 0.35
, december
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(day, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(opportunity, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(excuse, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(holiday, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(excuse, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(holiday, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(australia day, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(holiday, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(day, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(excuse, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(holiday, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(excuse, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(opportunity, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(day, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(holiday, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(excuse, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(excuse, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(holiday, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(columbus day, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(december, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(day, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(excuse, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(opportunity, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(excuse, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(holiday, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(holiday, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(december, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(december, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(columbus day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(columbus day, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(australia day, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(australia day, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(australia day, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(australia day, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(australia day, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(holiday, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(day, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(excuse, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(holiday, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(excuse, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(day, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(december, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(columbus day, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(holiday, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(day, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(excuse, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(holiday, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(excuse, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(day, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(australia day, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)