bad food: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.67
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.54
, food
Weight: 0.54
Siblings junk food
Weight: 0.81
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.72
, donut
Weight: 0.55
, pet food
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
has quality good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad food, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, taste good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(donut, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad food, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chocolate milk, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, taste good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(donut, taste good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(donut, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(donut, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(bad food, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad food, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(bad food, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(bad food, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad food, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad food, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad food, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(donut, taste good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, taste good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(donut, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(bad food, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)