donut: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, junk food
Weight: 0.54
Siblings pretzel
Weight: 0.35
, sandwich
Weight: 0.35
, muffin
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.35
, bagel
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste cold 0.89
is good 0.79
has quality good 0.79
is tasty 0.77
be such good compliment for pizza 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(donut, taste good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(junk food, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(donut, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(junk food, is tasty)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is tasty)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bagel, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(muffin, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pretzel, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bagel, is tasty)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(donut, taste good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(junk food, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(donut, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bagel, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bagel, taste good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sandwich, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pretzel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(pretzel, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bagel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(bagel, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bagel, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(bagel, is tasty)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(muffin, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(muffin, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(donut, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(donut, taste cold)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste cold)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(donut, taste cold)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(donut, taste cold)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(donut, be such good compliment for pizza)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(donut, is good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(donut, be such good compliment for pizza)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(donut, be such good compliment for pizza)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(donut, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(donut, is tasty)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(donut, be such good compliment for pizza)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(donut, is good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(donut, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(donut, is good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(donut, is tasty)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(donut, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(donut, is tasty)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(donut, is tasty)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(donut, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(donut, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(junk food, is tasty)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bagel, taste good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bagel, is tasty)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bagel, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pretzel, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(muffin, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(donut, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(junk food, is tasty)