donut: is good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, junk food
Weight: 0.54
Siblings pretzel
Weight: 0.35
, sandwich
Weight: 0.35
, muffin
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.35
, bagel
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good 1.00
has quality good 0.87
go bad 0.83
taste good 0.79
has quality better 0.79
is awesome 0.78
is healthy 0.76
be such good compliment for pizza 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(donut, is good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(junk food, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(donut, is good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(junk food, is healthy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is healthy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(muffin, is healthy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bagel, is healthy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(muffin, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, is healthy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pretzel, is healthy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pretzel, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bagel, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(donut, is good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(junk food, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(donut, is good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pretzel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(pretzel, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bagel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(bagel, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(muffin, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(muffin, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bagel, taste good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bagel, taste good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(pretzel, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pretzel, is healthy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(muffin, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(muffin, is healthy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(sandwich, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sandwich, is healthy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bagel, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bagel, is healthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(donut, is good)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(donut, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(donut, go bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(donut, go bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(donut, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(donut, go bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(donut, go bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(donut, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(donut, taste good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(donut, be such good compliment for pizza)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(donut, taste good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(donut, is awesome)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(donut, be such good compliment for pizza)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(donut, is healthy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(donut, be such good compliment for pizza)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(donut, is awesome)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(donut, taste good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(donut, be such good compliment for pizza)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(donut, is healthy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(donut, is awesome)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(donut, is healthy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(donut, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(donut, is healthy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(donut, is awesome)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(donut, is good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(junk food, is healthy)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(muffin, is healthy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bagel, taste good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bagel, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pretzel, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(muffin, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pretzel, is healthy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bagel, is healthy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(sandwich, is healthy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(donut, is good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(junk food, is healthy)