donut: be such good compliment for pizza

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, junk food
Weight: 0.54
Siblings pretzel
Weight: 0.35
, sandwich
Weight: 0.35
, muffin
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.35
, bagel
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be such good compliment for pizza 1.00
look like donuts 0.78
is good 0.75
taste good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bagel, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bagel, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bagel, taste good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sandwich, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(donut, be such good compliment for pizza)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(donut, look like donuts)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(donut, look like donuts)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(donut, taste good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(donut, is good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(donut, look like donuts)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, is good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(donut, taste good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(donut, is good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(donut, look like donuts)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(donut, taste good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(donut, is good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(donut, be such good compliment for pizza)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(donut, be such good compliment for pizza)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bagel, taste good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(donut, be such good compliment for pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)