donut: taste cold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, junk food
Weight: 0.54
Siblings pretzel
Weight: 0.35
, sandwich
Weight: 0.35
, muffin
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.35
, bagel
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste cold 1.00
taste good 0.89
be served cold 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bagel, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bagel, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bagel, taste good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sandwich, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(donut, taste cold)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(donut, be served cold)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(donut, be served cold)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(donut, taste good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(donut, be served cold)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(donut, be served cold)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(donut, taste good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(donut, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(donut, taste cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bagel, taste good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(donut, taste cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)