bald eagle: be at large forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raptor
Weight: 0.71
, eagle
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, predator
Weight: 0.66
, black bear
Weight: 0.66
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, unicorn
Weight: 0.36
, raven
Weight: 0.35
, owl
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at large forest 1.00
be at in forest 0.94
be at forest 0.94
be at forest on coast 0.83
be at north american forest 0.79
be at northern forest of north america 0.78
be at tropical rainforest 0.76
be at it natural habitat 0.76
be at natural habitat 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at large forest)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at large forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be at north american forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(owl, be at in forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at large forest)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(black bear, be at north american forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at large forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(owl, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(owl, be at in forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at large forest)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at forest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at forest on coast)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at forest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at forest on coast)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at forest)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at forest on coast)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at forest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at forest on coast)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at large forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at large forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(black bear, be at north american forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(owl, be at in forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(bald eagle, be at large forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(black bear, be at north american forest)