band: is popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, ensemble
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.61
, scene
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sonic youth
Weight: 0.73
, orchestra
Weight: 0.72
, rubber band
Weight: 0.70
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.69
, jimi hendrix
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular 1.00
be like popular 0.92
be like emmure popular 0.92
become popular 0.91
become less popular 0.83
is famous 0.78
become famous 0.77
was famous 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(scene, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(band, is popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(scene, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(scene, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(jimi hendrix, is popular)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ozzy osbourne, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(jimi hendrix, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ozzy osbourne, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(jimi hendrix, was famous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(scene, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(band, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ozzy osbourne, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ozzy osbourne, is popular)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(jimi hendrix, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(jimi hendrix, is popular)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ozzy osbourne, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ozzy osbourne, is famous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(jimi hendrix, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(jimi hendrix, is famous)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(jimi hendrix, was famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(jimi hendrix, was famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(band, is popular)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(band, become less popular)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(band, become less popular)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(band, become less popular)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(band, become famous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(band, is famous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(band, become famous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, is famous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(band, become famous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(band, is famous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(band, become famous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(band, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(band, is popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(band, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(scene, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(jimi hendrix, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ozzy osbourne, is popular)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ozzy osbourne, is famous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(jimi hendrix, is famous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(jimi hendrix, was famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(band, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(scene, is popular)