band: become less popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, ensemble
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.61
, scene
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sonic youth
Weight: 0.73
, orchestra
Weight: 0.72
, rubber band
Weight: 0.70
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.69
, jimi hendrix
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
become less popular 1.00
become popular 0.93
become famous 0.84
is popular 0.83
be like popular 0.82
be like emmure popular 0.82
becomes hot 0.78
become sticky 0.77
become brittle 0.76
is expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(scene, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(band, become less popular)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(band, become less popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(project, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(scene, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(scene, is popular)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(project, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(jimi hendrix, is popular)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ozzy osbourne, is popular)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rubber band, becomes hot)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(rubber band, become brittle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(rubber band, become sticky)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(scene, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(band, become less popular)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(project, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(band, become less popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(rubber band, become brittle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(rubber band, become brittle)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(rubber band, become sticky) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(rubber band, become sticky)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ozzy osbourne, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ozzy osbourne, is popular)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(jimi hendrix, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(jimi hendrix, is popular)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(rubber band, becomes hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(rubber band, becomes hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(band, become less popular)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(band, become famous)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(band, is popular)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(band, become famous)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(band, is popular)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(band, become famous)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(band, become famous)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(band, is popular)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(band, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(band, become less popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(scene, is popular)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(rubber band, become brittle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(jimi hendrix, is popular)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ozzy osbourne, is popular)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rubber band, become sticky)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rubber band, becomes hot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(project, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(band, become less popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(scene, is popular)