banker: wear suits

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.64
, person
Weight: 0.61
, business people
Weight: 0.60
, businessman
Weight: 0.59
Siblings mortgage lender
Weight: 0.36
, banking
Weight: 0.36
, stockbroker
Weight: 0.36
, bank
Weight: 0.36
, bank statement
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear suits 1.00
wear patagonia 0.86
wear visors 0.80
wear green visors 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(businessman, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(banker, wear suits)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(banker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(businessman, wear suits)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(banker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(businessman, wear suits)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(businessman, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(banker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(banker, wear suits)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(banker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(banker, wear suits)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(banker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(banker, wear patagonia)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(banker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(banker, wear patagonia)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(banker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(banker, wear patagonia)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(banker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(banker, wear patagonia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(banker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(banker, wear visors)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(banker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(banker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(banker, wear suits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(banker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(banker, wear suits)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(banker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(businessman, wear suits)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(banker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(businessman, wear suits)