businessman: wear suits

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.57
, friend
Weight: 0.56
, resident
Weight: 0.55
, student
Weight: 0.55
Siblings banker
Weight: 0.59
, entrepreneur
Weight: 0.36
, old man
Weight: 0.35
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear suits 1.00
wear socks 0.82
wear red socks 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(banker, wear suits)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(banker, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(banker, wear suits)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(businessman, wear suits)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(businessman, wear socks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(businessman, wear socks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(businessman, wear red socks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(businessman, wear red socks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(businessman, wear socks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(businessman, wear red socks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(businessman, wear socks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(businessman, wear red socks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(businessman, wear suits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(businessman, wear suits)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(banker, wear suits)