businessman: wear red socks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.57
, friend
Weight: 0.56
, resident
Weight: 0.55
, student
Weight: 0.55
Siblings banker
Weight: 0.59
, entrepreneur
Weight: 0.36
, old man
Weight: 0.35
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear red socks 1.00
wear socks 0.97
wear suits 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(businessman, wear red socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(banker, wear suits)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(businessman, wear red socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(banker, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(banker, wear suits)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(businessman, wear red socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(businessman, wear red socks)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(businessman, wear red socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(businessman, wear socks)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(businessman, wear red socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(businessman, wear socks)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(businessman, wear red socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(businessman, wear socks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(businessman, wear red socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(businessman, wear suits)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(businessman, wear red socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(businessman, wear suits)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(businessman, wear red socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(businessman, wear suits)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(businessman, wear red socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(businessman, wear socks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(businessman, wear red socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(businessman, wear suits)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(businessman, wear red socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(businessman, wear red socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(businessman, wear red socks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(businessman, wear red socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(businessman, wear red socks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(businessman, wear red socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(banker, wear suits)