banker: wear visors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.64
, person
Weight: 0.61
, business people
Weight: 0.60
, businessman
Weight: 0.59
Siblings mortgage lender
Weight: 0.36
, banking
Weight: 0.36
, stockbroker
Weight: 0.36
, bank
Weight: 0.36
, bank statement
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear visors 1.00
wear green visors 0.97
wear patagonia 0.84
wear suits 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(banker, wear visors)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(businessman, wear suits)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(businessman, wear suits)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(businessman, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(banker, wear visors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(banker, wear visors)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(banker, wear green visors)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(banker, wear patagonia)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(banker, wear patagonia)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(banker, wear green visors)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(banker, wear patagonia)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(banker, wear patagonia)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(banker, wear green visors)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(banker, wear suits)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(banker, wear green visors)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(banker, wear suits)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(banker, wear suits)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(banker, wear suits)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(banker, wear visors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(banker, wear visors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(businessman, wear suits)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(banker, wear visors)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(businessman, wear suits)