baseball player: be paid most

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents basketball player
Weight: 0.81
, player
Weight: 0.73
, football player
Weight: 0.73
, sport
Weight: 0.69
Siblings baseball
Weight: 0.64
, pitcher
Weight: 0.58
, baseball game
Weight: 0.40
, baseball team
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be paid most 1.00
get paid 0.89
get paid more basketball players 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(football player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(baseball player, be paid most)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(basketball player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(baseball player, be paid most)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(football player, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(football player, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(football player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(baseball player, be paid most)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(basketball player, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(baseball player, be paid most)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(baseball player, be paid most)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(baseball player, get paid)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(baseball player, get paid)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(baseball player, get paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, be paid most)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(baseball player, be paid most)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(football player, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(baseball player, be paid most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(football player, get paid)