baseball player: get paid more basketball players

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents basketball player
Weight: 0.81
, player
Weight: 0.73
, football player
Weight: 0.73
, sport
Weight: 0.69
Siblings baseball
Weight: 0.64
, pitcher
Weight: 0.58
, baseball game
Weight: 0.40
, baseball team
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid more basketball players 1.00
get paid football players 0.95
make more than football 0.85
get paid 0.79
play games 0.76
be paid most 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(football player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(football player, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, get paid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(football player, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pitcher, play games)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(baseball team, play games)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(football player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(basketball player, get paid)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(baseball team, play games)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(baseball team, play games)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(pitcher, play games)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pitcher, play games)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(baseball player, get paid football players)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(baseball player, get paid football players)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid football players)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(baseball player, get paid football players)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(baseball player, play games)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, be paid most)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(baseball player, get paid)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(baseball player, be paid most)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(baseball player, play games)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, play games)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(baseball player, get paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(baseball player, play games)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(baseball player, be paid most)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(baseball player, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(baseball player, be paid most)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(football player, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pitcher, play games)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(baseball team, play games)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(basketball player, get paid)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(baseball player, get paid more basketball players)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(football player, get paid)