bdd: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental illness
Weight: 0.40
, framework
Weight: 0.38
, concept
Weight: 0.36
, practice
Weight: 0.36
, development
Weight: 0.35
Siblings heart disease
Weight: 0.26
, bipolar disorder
Weight: 0.25
, personality disorder
Weight: 0.25
, eating disorder
Weight: 0.25
, alcoholism
Weight: 0.25

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
is quality 0.87
be bad for environment 0.80
be good for business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(framework, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bdd, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(framework, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bdd, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bdd, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bdd, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bdd, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bdd, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(development, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(framework, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(framework, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(framework, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(personality disorder, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heart disease, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(alcoholism, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(heart disease, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has quality worse)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(framework, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bdd, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bdd, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(framework, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bdd, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bdd, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bdd, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bdd, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(personality disorder, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(personality disorder, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(heart disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(eating disorder, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(heart disease, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(heart disease, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(alcoholism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(alcoholism, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, has quality worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(bdd, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bdd, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(bdd, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bdd, is quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bdd, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(bdd, is quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(bdd, is quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bdd, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bdd, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(development, be bad for environment)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(framework, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(framework, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(personality disorder, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, has quality worse)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(alcoholism, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(framework, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(framework, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(development, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(bdd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)