development: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
affect environment 0.87
be different in dynamic uncertain environment 0.81
has quality bad 0.80
affect climate 0.78
go bad 0.77
has quality good 0.77
be done bad 0.76
be important process for living things 0.76
be important for life 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(process, be different in dynamic uncertain environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(development, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(development, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(aspect, affect climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(development, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(aspect, affect climate)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(process, be different in dynamic uncertain environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aspect, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(process, be different in dynamic uncertain environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(aspect, affect climate)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(well, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(well, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(well, be done bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important process for living things)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(process, be different in dynamic uncertain environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(development, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(development, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(aspect, affect climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(development, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(well, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(well, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(well, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(well, go bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(well, be done bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(well, be done bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(acquisition, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(acquisition, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(acquisition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(acquisition, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cell division, be important process for living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important process for living things)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(development, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(development, affect environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(development, affect environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(development, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(development, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(development, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(aspect, affect climate)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(process, be different in dynamic uncertain environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(well, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(acquisition, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(well, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(well, be done bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(acquisition, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cell division, be important process for living things)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(aspect, affect climate)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(process, be different in dynamic uncertain environment)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(development, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)