beauty: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fairy tale
Weight: 0.65
, quality
Weight: 0.63
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hair salon
Weight: 0.68
, glory
Weight: 0.65
, grace kelly
Weight: 0.64
, waterfall
Weight: 0.59
, samantha
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is ungiven good 0.87
has quality worth 0.85
has quality system 0.84
is great 0.81
has quality beauty 0.77
has quality advantage 0.77
be better than quantity 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(quality, be better than quantity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(quality, be better than quantity)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waterfall, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(glory, is great)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(waterfall, has quality advantage)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(waterfall, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(waterfall, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(glory, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(glory, is great)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(waterfall, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(waterfall, has quality advantage)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(beauty, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(beauty, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beauty, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(beauty, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(glory, is great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(waterfall, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(waterfall, has quality advantage)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(beauty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)