beaver: be at woodland pond

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.77
, wild animal
Weight: 0.73
, animal
Weight: 0.70
, mammal
Weight: 0.68
, fish
Weight: 0.62
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.38
, elk
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, wolf
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at woodland pond 1.00
be at woodland 0.95
be at bwaver pond 0.89
be at pond 0.89
be at wooded stream or lake 0.87
live in pond 0.86
be at pond lake or stream 0.86
be at meadow 0.85
be at beaver pond 0.83
be at in lake 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fish, live in pond)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mammal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(animal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at woodland)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(animal, be at meadow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at meadow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(fish, live in pond)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fish, be at in lake)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at meadow)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at meadow)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at woodland)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(fish, live in pond)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in lake)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be at meadow)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(elk, be at meadow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fish, live in pond)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mammal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(animal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(elk, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(elk, be at meadow)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rabbit, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rabbit, be at meadow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(beaver, be at woodland pond)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at woodland)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at pond)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded stream or lake)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(beaver, be at wooded stream or lake)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at pond)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at beaver pond)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(beaver, be at beaver pond)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(beaver, be at pond)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at beaver pond)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(beaver, be at woodland)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(beaver, be at woodland)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(beaver, be at wooded stream or lake)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at wooded stream or lake)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(beaver, be at pond)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(beaver, be at beaver pond)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fish, be at in lake)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(fish, live in pond)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rodent, be at meadow)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, be at meadow)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(animal, be at meadow)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(elk, be at meadow)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rabbit, be at meadow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fish, be at in lake)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(fish, live in pond)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rodent, be at meadow)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, be at meadow)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(animal, be at meadow)