rodent: be at meadow

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, mammal
Weight: 0.64
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.62
, vermin
Weight: 0.61
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings beaver
Weight: 0.77
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.76
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.72
, rabbit
Weight: 0.69
, rat
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at meadow 1.00
be at woodland pond 0.85
be at woodland 0.83
be at wooded stream or lake 0.82
be at wooded area 0.79
be at garden 0.78
be at mcgregors garden 0.78
be at pond lake or stream 0.77
be at bwaver pond 0.76
be at pond 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mammal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rodent, be at meadow)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rodent, be at meadow)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(animal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rodent, be at meadow)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rodent, be at meadow)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(animal, be at meadow)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at meadow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at woodland)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at meadow)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at meadow)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at woodland)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be at meadow)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at garden)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be at mcgregors garden)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded stream or lake)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at pond)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mammal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(wild animal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(animal, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rabbit, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rabbit, be at meadow)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland pond)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at woodland pond)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded stream or lake)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at wooded stream or lake)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(beaver, be at woodland)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at woodland)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rabbit, be at mcgregors garden)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rabbit, be at mcgregors garden)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(beaver, be at wooded area)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at wooded area)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(beaver, be at pond)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at pond)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(beaver, be at garden)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at garden)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(rodent, be at meadow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rodent, be at meadow)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, be at meadow)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(animal, be at meadow)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(beaver, be at woodland pond)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(beaver, be at wooded stream or lake)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rabbit, be at meadow)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(beaver, be at woodland)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(beaver, be at pond)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(beaver, be at wooded area)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beaver, be at garden)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rabbit, be at mcgregors garden)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at meadow)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, be at meadow)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(animal, be at meadow)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rodent, be at meadow)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)