beer: be better on tap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.67
, beverage
Weight: 0.66
, drink
Weight: 0.63
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.62
Siblings guinness
Weight: 0.66
, sierra nevada
Weight: 0.59
, porter
Weight: 0.57
, bud
Weight: 0.57
, corona
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on tap better 1.00
be better on tap 1.00
be on tap 0.96
taste better on tap 0.93
pour better in glass 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(guinness, be better on tap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(guinness, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(guinness, be better on tap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(beer, be better on tap)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(beer, taste better on tap)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(beer, taste better on tap)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beer, be on tap)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(beer, be on tap)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(beer, be on tap)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(beer, pour better in glass)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(beer, pour better in glass)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beer, pour better in glass)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(beer, taste better on tap)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(beer, be on tap)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(beer, pour better in glass)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, be better on tap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beer, be better on tap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, be better on tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(guinness, be better on tap)