beer: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.67
, beverage
Weight: 0.66
, drink
Weight: 0.63
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.62
Siblings guinness
Weight: 0.66
, sierra nevada
Weight: 0.59
, porter
Weight: 0.57
, bud
Weight: 0.57
, corona
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality prices 0.77
is best 0.76
is better cold 0.76
be better than american 0.75
be cheaper than water 0.75
is stronger 0.75
taste better on tap 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(beer, has quality better)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(beer, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(guinness, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(guinness, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(corona, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bud, is best)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(beer, has quality better)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(beer, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(guinness, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(guinness, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(corona, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(corona, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(guinness, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(guinness, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(bud, is best)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bud, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(beer, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beer, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(beer, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(beer, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(beer, be cheaper than water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(beer, be cheaper than water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(beer, be cheaper than water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(beer, taste better on tap)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(beer, be cheaper than water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(beer, taste better on tap)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(beer, taste better on tap)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste better on tap)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(beer, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(guinness, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(corona, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(guinness, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bud, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(beer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)