drink: be cheaper than water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, beer
Weight: 0.67
, meal
Weight: 0.65
, beverage
Weight: 0.61
Siblings drinking water
Weight: 0.77
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.75
, apple juice
Weight: 0.74
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.73
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than water 1.00
is expensive 0.82
be used as cleaner 0.77
is water 0.77
is quicker 0.77
be better than light beer 0.77
be cheap in relation to cost 0.77
be better than non light beer 0.76
be cheap in relation to cost of apples 0.76
be better than non beer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(beer, be better than non light beer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(beer, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(beer, be cheaper than water)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(beer, be better than non light beer)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(beer, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(beer, be cheaper than water)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(beer, be better than non light beer)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(beer, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(beer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(beer, be better than non light beer)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(beer, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(chocolate milk, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(drink, be cheaper than water)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(drink, is water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(drink, be used as cleaner)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(drink, be used as cleaner)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(drink, is water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(drink, be used as cleaner)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(drink, be used as cleaner)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(drink, is water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(drink, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(drink, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(drink, is water)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(drink, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(beer, be cheaper than water)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(beer, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beer, be better than non light beer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(beer, be cheaper than water)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(beer, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beer, be better than non light beer)