beet: be good for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable
Weight: 0.70
, cabbage
Weight: 0.59
, crop
Weight: 0.56
, flavor
Weight: 0.55
, food
Weight: 0.55
Siblings sweet potato
Weight: 0.38
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37
, potato
Weight: 0.37
, vegetable oil
Weight: 0.37
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for dogs 1.00
be good for us 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cabbage, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(beet, be good for dogs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(beet, be good for dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cabbage, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beet, be good for dogs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beet, be good for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be good for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(beet, be good for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beet, be good for us)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(beet, be good for us)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(beet, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(beet, be good for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be good for dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for us)