cabbage: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.65
, herb
Weight: 0.59
, plant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings brussels sprout
Weight: 0.65
, beet
Weight: 0.59
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.38
, radish
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
be good for dogs 0.78
be good for body 0.78
be considered good luck 0.76
be bad for dogs 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(vegetable, be good for body)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be good for body)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be good for body)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for body)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(vegetable, be good for body)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(radish, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(radish, be good for us)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(beet, be good for us)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beet, be good for dogs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(radish, be good for body)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(radish, be good for body)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(cabbage, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(cabbage, be good for body)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(cabbage, be bad for dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for body)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cabbage, be bad for dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cabbage, be considered good luck)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cabbage, be considered good luck)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be bad for dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be good for body)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be considered good luck)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for body)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be considered good luck)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vegetable, be good for body)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(beet, be good for dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beet, be good for us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(radish, be good for us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(radish, be good for body)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vegetable, be good for body)