cabbage: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.65
, herb
Weight: 0.59
, plant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings brussels sprout
Weight: 0.65
, beet
Weight: 0.59
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.38
, radish
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be good for dogs 0.97
be in dog food 0.87
be bad for horses 0.85
be bad for bunnies 0.82
be good for us 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radish, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beet, be good for dogs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(radish, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(radish, be good for us)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(beet, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(beet, be good for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(cabbage, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be bad for horses)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for horses)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be bad for bunnies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(cabbage, be bad for horses)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for bunnies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cabbage, be bad for bunnies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cabbage, be bad for horses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cabbage, be bad for bunnies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cabbage, be in dog food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be in dog food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(cabbage, be in dog food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for us)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be in dog food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(cabbage, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cabbage, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(beet, be good for dogs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beet, be good for us)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(radish, be good for us)