beet: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable
Weight: 0.70
, cabbage
Weight: 0.59
, crop
Weight: 0.56
, flavor
Weight: 0.55
, food
Weight: 0.55
Siblings sweet potato
Weight: 0.38
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37
, potato
Weight: 0.37
, vegetable oil
Weight: 0.37
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
has quality good 0.80
be good for dogs 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beet, be good for us)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beet, be good for us)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beet, be good for us)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cabbage, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beet, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for us)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(potato, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cabbage, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(beet, be good for us)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(beet, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(beet, be good for us)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cabbage, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(beet, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(potato, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(potato, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be good for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(beet, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(beet, be good for dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beet, be good for dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(beet, be good for dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beet, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(beet, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(beet, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(beet, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beet, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for us)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be good for dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(potato, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(beet, be good for us)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)