sweet potato: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.74
, vegetable
Weight: 0.74
, flavor
Weight: 0.73
, onion ring
Weight: 0.69
Siblings butternut
Weight: 0.54
, potato salad
Weight: 0.40
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.39
, pear
Weight: 0.38
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality better 0.94
be associated with bad quality 0.81
be good for health 0.80
be good for us 0.80
has quality joke 0.79
were great 0.79
taste good 0.79
has quality evil 0.78
is good food product 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(onion ring, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(onion ring, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(potato, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(onion ring, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(potato, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(potato, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(onion ring, has quality joke)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality joke)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(potato, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(potato, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tomato juice, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(onion ring, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(onion ring, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(potato, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(potato salad, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(tomato juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato juice, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pear, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for us)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sweet potato, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(potato, taste good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(onion ring, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(potato, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(onion ring, has quality joke)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(potato salad, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pear, be good for us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato juice, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(onion ring, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(potato, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(potato, taste good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(sweet potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(onion ring, has quality joke)