sweet potato: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.74
, vegetable
Weight: 0.74
, flavor
Weight: 0.73
, onion ring
Weight: 0.69
Siblings butternut
Weight: 0.54
, potato salad
Weight: 0.40
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.39
, pear
Weight: 0.38
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
be better than white 0.81
be better than regular 0.80
be associated with bad quality 0.78
be healthier than white 0.77
has quality joke 0.77
be better than eating 0.76
be good for health 0.76
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(onion ring, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(potato, be healthier than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(onion ring, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vegetable, be better than eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(onion ring, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(potato, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(potato, be better than white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be better than eating)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(onion ring, has quality joke)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(potato, be healthier than white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality joke)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(potato, be healthier than white)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(onion ring, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(potato, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than white)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be better than eating)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tomato juice, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(onion ring, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(potato, be healthier than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(onion ring, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vegetable, be better than eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(potato salad, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(tomato juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato juice, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sweet potato, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be better than white)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than white)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be better than regular)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be healthier than white)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be healthier than white)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be healthier than white)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vegetable, be better than eating)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(onion ring, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(potato, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(onion ring, has quality joke)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(potato, be healthier than white)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(potato, be better than white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(potato salad, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato juice, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(onion ring, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(potato, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(potato, be better than white)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vegetable, be better than eating)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(potato, be healthier than white)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(onion ring, has quality joke)