cabbage: be bad for bunnies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.65
, herb
Weight: 0.59
, plant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings brussels sprout
Weight: 0.65
, beet
Weight: 0.59
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.38
, radish
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for bunnies 1.00
be bad for dogs 0.82
be good for dogs 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for bunnies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cabbage, be bad for bunnies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(beet, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beet, be good for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cabbage, be bad for bunnies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cabbage, be bad for bunnies)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for bunnies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cabbage, be bad for bunnies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(cabbage, be bad for dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cabbage, be bad for bunnies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be bad for dogs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for bunnies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cabbage, be bad for bunnies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cabbage, be bad for dogs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cabbage, be bad for bunnies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cabbage, be bad for bunnies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cabbage, be good for dogs)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cabbage, be bad for bunnies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be good for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cabbage, be bad for bunnies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cabbage, be bad for bunnies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for bunnies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cabbage, be bad for bunnies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cabbage, be bad for bunnies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be bad for bunnies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(beet, be good for dogs)