behavior: be explainable according to choice theory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.63
, act
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, indicator
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.71
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68
, altruism
Weight: 0.68
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be explainable according to choice theory 1.00
be explainable according to rational choice theory 0.98
be important theory 0.80
be problem for theory 0.79
be problem for evolutionary theory 0.79
support theory 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(activity, support theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(activity, support theory)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(activity, support theory)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for theory)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(activity, support theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(altruism, be problem for theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(altruism, be problem for theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(behavior, be explainable according to rational choice theory)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be explainable according to rational choice theory)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(behavior, be explainable according to rational choice theory)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(behavior, be explainable according to rational choice theory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(activity, support theory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(altruism, be problem for theory)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(activity, support theory)