bengal tiger: is protected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tiger
Weight: 0.79
, species
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, show
Weight: 0.45
Siblings rhino
Weight: 0.38
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is protected 1.00
need protected 0.96
protect themselves 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, is protected)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, is protected)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, is protected)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(species, is protected)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(species, need protected)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tiger, need protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tiger, need protected)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(species, is protected)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(species, need protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, protect themselves)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(elephant, protect themselves)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(monkey, protect themselves)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cougar, protect themselves)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, is protected)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, is protected)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, is protected)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cougar, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cougar, protect themselves)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(monkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(monkey, protect themselves)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(elephant, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(elephant, protect themselves)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(tiger shark, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, protect themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(bengal tiger, is protected)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(bengal tiger, need protected)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, need protected)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, need protected)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, protect themselves)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(bengal tiger, protect themselves)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, protect themselves)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, protect themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, is protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(species, need protected)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tiger, need protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cougar, protect themselves)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(monkey, protect themselves)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiger shark, protect themselves)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(elephant, protect themselves)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(species, need protected)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bengal tiger, is protected)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tiger, need protected)