bengal tiger: need protected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tiger
Weight: 0.79
, species
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, show
Weight: 0.45
Siblings rhino
Weight: 0.38
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
need protected 1.00
is protected 0.96
protect themselves 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, need protected)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, need protected)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, need protected)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(species, is protected)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(species, need protected)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tiger, need protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tiger, need protected)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(species, need protected)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(species, is protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, protect themselves)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(elephant, protect themselves)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(monkey, protect themselves)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cougar, protect themselves)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, need protected)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(species, need protected)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, need protected)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, need protected)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cougar, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cougar, protect themselves)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(monkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(monkey, protect themselves)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(elephant, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(elephant, protect themselves)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(tiger shark, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, protect themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(bengal tiger, need protected)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(bengal tiger, is protected)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is protected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, is protected)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, is protected)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(bengal tiger, protect themselves)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, protect themselves)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, protect themselves)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, protect themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, need protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(species, need protected)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tiger, need protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cougar, protect themselves)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(monkey, protect themselves)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiger shark, protect themselves)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(elephant, protect themselves)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(species, need protected)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(bengal tiger, need protected)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tiger, need protected)