berlin: was formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, artist
Weight: 0.58
, new york
Weight: 0.56
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.34
, louis armstrong
Weight: 0.33
, las vegas
Weight: 0.33
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formed 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(berlin, was formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(berlin, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(berlin, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(berlin, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(berlin, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(berlin, was formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(berlin, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(berlin, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(berlin, was formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(berlin, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(berlin, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(berlin, was formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(berlin, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(berlin, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(berlin, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(berlin, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(berlin, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)