biodiversity: is everyone concern

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, carbon
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, carbon tetrachloride
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is everyone concern 1.00
is is should everyones concern 0.86
loss of is concern 0.83
is good thing 0.77
is thing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(conservation, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(conservation, is thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(conservation, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(biodiversity, is everyone concern)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, is is should everyones concern)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(biodiversity, is is should everyones concern)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is is should everyones concern)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(biodiversity, loss of is concern)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, loss of is concern)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, loss of is concern)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(biodiversity, is good thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(biodiversity, is is should everyones concern)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(biodiversity, loss of is concern)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(biodiversity, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is everyone concern)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(biodiversity, is everyone concern)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(conservation, is thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is everyone concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, is good thing)