biologist: use microscope

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.71
, researcher
Weight: 0.62
, specialist
Weight: 0.55
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.55
Siblings naturalist
Weight: 0.64
, stephen jay gould
Weight: 0.58
, geologist
Weight: 0.58
, ecologist
Weight: 0.54
, botanist
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
use microscope 1.00
use microscope since invention of electron microscope 0.91
use microscopes 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(biologist, use microscope)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(scientist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(biologist, use microscope)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(scientist, use microscope)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(scientist, use microscopes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use microscope)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use microscopes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(geologist, use microscopes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(biologist, use microscope)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(scientist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(biologist, use microscope)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(geologist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(geologist, use microscopes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(biologist, use microscope)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(biologist, use microscope since invention of electron microscope)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use microscope since invention of electron microscope)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(biologist, use microscope since invention of electron microscope)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(biologist, use microscope since invention of electron microscope)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use microscope)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(biologist, use microscope)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(scientist, use microscope)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(scientist, use microscopes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(geologist, use microscopes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(scientist, use microscope)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(biologist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(scientist, use microscopes)