bipolar disorder: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental disorder
Weight: 0.89
, personality disorder
Weight: 0.87
, mental illness
Weight: 0.73
, symptom
Weight: 0.73
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.72
Siblings obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.43
, eating disorder
Weight: 0.43
, schizophrenia
Weight: 0.41
, psychosis
Weight: 0.41
, epilepsy
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
be less of problem 0.86
is social problem 0.85
be problem in society 0.85
be social problem 0.85
is growing problem 0.84
be less of problem in army 0.80
be considered health problems 0.80
is issue 0.78
be classified as problems 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mental illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mental disorder, be less of problem in army) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mental illness, is growing problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mental illness, be social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(mental illness, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mental disorder, be less of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(mental illness, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mental disorder, be less of problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mental illness, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mental illness, be social problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(mental illness, is issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(mental illness, is growing problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mental illness, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mental disorder, be less of problem in army)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mental disorder, be less of problem in army)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, has state problem)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mental disorder, be less of problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, be social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, is growing problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, is issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, is social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be classified as problems)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be problem in society)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(schizophrenia, is social problem)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be considered health problems)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mental illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mental disorder, be less of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(mental illness, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mental illness, is growing problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mental illness, be social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mental disorder, be less of problem in army) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(mental illness, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(schizophrenia, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(schizophrenia, is social problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(epilepsy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(epilepsy, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(eating disorder, be considered health problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be considered health problems)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(eating disorder, be problem in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be problem in society)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(eating disorder, be classified as problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be classified as problems)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(bipolar disorder, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mental illness, is social problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mental disorder, be less of problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(mental illness, be social problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mental illness, is issue)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mental illness, is growing problem)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mental illness, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mental disorder, be less of problem in army)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be considered health problems)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(schizophrenia, is social problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be classified as problems)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be problem in society)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(epilepsy, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mental illness, is social problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mental disorder, be less of problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(mental illness, be social problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mental illness, is issue)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mental illness, is growing problem)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mental illness, has state problem)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(bipolar disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mental disorder, be less of problem in army)