blind people: use phones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.61
, everyone
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.59
, pedestrian
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings poor people
Weight: 0.34
, deaf people
Weight: 0.34
, homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, different people
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use phones 1.00
use phone 0.88
use smartphone 0.83
use computers 0.80
use personal electrical devices 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, use computers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(deaf people, use computers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(deaf people, use computers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(blind people, use phones)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use smartphone)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(blind people, use smartphone)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(blind people, use smartphone)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(blind people, use phone)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(blind people, use phone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use phone)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(blind people, use phone)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(blind people, use smartphone)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(blind people, use computers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use computers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(blind people, use computers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(blind people, use computers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use phones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(blind people, use phones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use phones)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(deaf people, use computers)