deaf people: use computers

Related concepts

Parents	everyone Weight: 0.55 , culture Weight: 0.45 , group Weight: 0.39 , college Weight: 0.35 , part Weight: 0.32
Siblings	blind people Weight: 0.34 , poor people Weight: 0.29 , folk music Weight: 0.29 , children Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property	Similarity
use computers	1.00
use telephones	0.79
play computer games	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(blind people, use computers)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(blind people, play computer games)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(blind people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(blind people, use computers)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

Remarkable(blind people, play computer games) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(blind people, play computer games)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(deaf people, use computers)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.04

Salient(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Salient(deaf people, play computer games)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(deaf people, play computer games)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(deaf people, play computer games)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(deaf people, use telephones)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.04

Salient(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(deaf people, use telephones)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(deaf people, use telephones)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.20

Typical(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(deaf people, play computer games)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.20

Typical(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(deaf people, use telephones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

Salient(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(deaf people, use computers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(deaf people, use computers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(blind people, use computers)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(deaf people, use computers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(blind people, play computer games)