deaf people: use telephones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents everyone
Weight: 0.55
, culture
Weight: 0.45
, group
Weight: 0.39
, college
Weight: 0.35
, part
Weight: 0.32
Siblings blind people
Weight: 0.34
, poor people
Weight: 0.29
, folk music
Weight: 0.29
, children
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
use telephones 1.00
use telephone 0.84
use computers 0.79
know phone is ringing 0.76
talk on phone 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use computers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(blind people, use computers)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(blind people, use computers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(deaf people, use telephones)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(deaf people, use computers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(deaf people, use computers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, use computers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, know phone is ringing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(deaf people, know phone is ringing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(deaf people, know phone is ringing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(deaf people, talk on phone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(deaf people, talk on phone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, talk on phone)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(deaf people, use computers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(deaf people, use telephone)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(deaf people, know phone is ringing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, use telephone)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(deaf people, talk on phone)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(deaf people, use telephone)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(deaf people, use telephone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, use telephones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(deaf people, use telephones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, use telephones)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(blind people, use computers)