blind people: use computers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.61
, everyone
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.59
, pedestrian
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings poor people
Weight: 0.34
, deaf people
Weight: 0.34
, homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, different people
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use computers 1.00
use computer 0.92
use personal electrical devices 0.81
use phones 0.80
play computer games 0.78
use internet 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, use computers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, play computer games)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(different people, use internet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(deaf people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(deaf people, use computers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(deaf people, play computer games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(deaf people, play computer games)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(different people, use internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(different people, use internet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(blind people, use computers)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(blind people, use computer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(blind people, use computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blind people, play computer games)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(blind people, play computer games)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(blind people, use computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(blind people, play computer games)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(blind people, use phones)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(blind people, use phones)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(blind people, use phones)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use phones)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(blind people, play computer games)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use internet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(blind people, use internet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(blind people, use internet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(blind people, use internet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use computers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(blind people, use computers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(deaf people, use computers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(deaf people, play computer games)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(blind people, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(different people, use internet)