blood transfusion: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents treatment
Weight: 0.70
, medication
Weight: 0.69
, complication
Weight: 0.66
, drug
Weight: 0.64
, care
Weight: 0.62
Siblings transfusion
Weight: 0.38
, blood clot
Weight: 0.38
, blood poisoning
Weight: 0.37
, blood vessel
Weight: 0.37
, dialysis
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality sin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(drug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(drug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(care, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(blood transfusion, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(care, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(drug, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(drug, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(care, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(drug, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(drug, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(blood clot, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(blood clot, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(drug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(drug, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(care, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(blood clot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(blood clot, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(blood clot, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(blood clot, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(blood transfusion, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(blood transfusion, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(blood transfusion, has quality sin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(blood transfusion, has quality sin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality sin)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality sin)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(blood transfusion, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(blood transfusion, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(care, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(drug, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(drug, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(dialysis, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(care, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(drug, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(drug, has quality good)