dialysis: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents treatment
Weight: 0.70
, condition
Weight: 0.62
, renal failure
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.58
, intervention
Weight: 0.55
Siblings hospital care
Weight: 0.37
, blood transfusion
Weight: 0.36
, transplant
Weight: 0.36
, chemotherapy
Weight: 0.36
, surgery
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
be bad in bulgaria 0.87
was good 0.81
is bad people 0.80
be in bad weather 0.76
has quality sin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(dialysis, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(dialysis, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(dialysis, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(intervention, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(surgery, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(chemotherapy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chemotherapy, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(transplant, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality sin)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(intervention, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(chemotherapy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chemotherapy, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(transplant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(transplant, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chemotherapy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(chemotherapy, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(surgery, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(surgery, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(blood transfusion, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(blood transfusion, has quality sin)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(surgery, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(surgery, was good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(dialysis, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(dialysis, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intervention, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(blood transfusion, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chemotherapy, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(transplant, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(blood transfusion, has quality sin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chemotherapy, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(blood transfusion, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(surgery, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(surgery, was good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intervention, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(dialysis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)