surgery: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	surgical procedure Weight: 0.59 , treatment Weight: 0.59 , intervention Weight: 0.58 , cause Weight: 0.57 , hospital care Weight: 0.57
Siblings	hysterectomy Weight: 0.76 , plastic surgery Weight: 0.70 , appendectomy Weight: 0.66 , tonsillectomy Weight: 0.64 , hip Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
was good	0.84
is good thing	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(intervention, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(surgery, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(intervention, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(intervention, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(hip, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(intervention, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(surgery, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(plastic surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(hip, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(hip, has quality bad)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, has quality bad)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(plastic surgery, is good thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(surgery, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(surgery, was good)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(surgery, was good)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(surgery, was good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(surgery, was good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(surgery, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(surgery, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(intervention, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(hip, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(hysterectomy, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(plastic surgery, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(plastic surgery, is good thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Typical(surgery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(intervention, has quality good)